From: http://www.spd.org/2009/12/behind-the-new-york-times-maga-1.php
Behind The New York Times Magazine's Redesign with DD Arem Duplessis
In June of this year, The New York Times unveiled a major redesign of their Sunday magazine, the first in almost a decade, and one of only a handful ever in its more than 100 years. Under the leadership of Design Director Arem Duplessis, a more lithe version of the magazine (smaller by about 9% in trim size) has been greeted with much appreciation around the design community for its subtle transitions of typography and color palette that exude new energy while staying true to the NYT Magazine everyone knows and loves (and obsesses about). Almost six months later, with enough issues printed to have some room to look back, we asked Rem to talk with SPD about the redesign process and the modern magazine business at the Times these days. His generous, detailed, honest reporting after the jump...
SPD: Tell us about how you decided it was time to redesign.
Arem Duplessis: In February of 2009 we were told that the size of our magazine was being reduced by 9 percent. Like most companies, reducing costs was and is a major priority. We approached the reduction with a "glass half-full" mentality and saw it as an opportunity to rethink the structure of The New York Times Magazine. Our editor, Gerry Marzorati, had a few mandates, the biggest being that he wanted more immediacy with the covers-- translation: larger headlines.
But of course: what every editor wants. (laughs) With a project this big, for a book so revered, where do you even start?
The first step was to find the right fonts. We must have done a million studies before settling on three new ones; Lyon Text (designed by Kai Bernau and Christian Schwartz) for our body copy.
So your editor tells you he wants more immediacy with the covers (bigger headlines), but you must know some of your colleagues working at other magazines would kill to have what they see as your freedom with cover design. How did you work towards meeting your Editor's goal and preserving the magazine's tradition of bold, challenging covers?
One of the benefits of working for The New York Times Magazine is the amount of commissions we can do. Our covers vary greatly from week to week, and we do 52 of them. On any given month we may have a mixture of illustration, photography and type. Sometimes we get it right; sometimes we don't. Here are the ones we believe we got right (all from our redesign):
Our old table of contents was functional (a big picture from the cover story with headlines and page numbers beneath) but was a challenge from week to week. We didn't always have the right photograph, or the cover article was illustration or type, leaving us scrambling for the right image. With the redesign, we created four options for the table of contents to increase flexibility.
Tell us about redesigning the front-of-book sections.
In the previous design the first page of our front-of-book section was dominated by a large date. By losing the date we were able to enlarge the name of the section ("The Way We Live Now"), which seems more relevant to the topics we cover in the section. Another important goal was to enlarge the photography that is featured on the opening page. We also integrated a small chart and illustration at the top of the page for visual impact.
What about "Questions for..."?
Our readers are very passionate about this page. We found out the hard way by introducing a "cinematic approach" to the photography. Seems readers missed seeing the feet of the subject and wanted the old format back. We accommodated that request, and of course, I heard complaints asking why we abandoned the new format. Seems some people took a liking to it. If you try and please everyone, you lose every time, as we all know.
We kept the architecture of the food pages pretty much intact, but we wanted to organize the information a little better.
Let's get into some of the issues you've produced since the redesign. What are some of the commissions and packages you've really felt proud of?
Our redesign was launched on June 14th with a special themed issue on Infrastructure. We launched it with two covers, one by the very talented artist Thomas Doyle (photo) and illustration by the incredibly detail-crazed maniacs (and I say this with admiration-- just look at it) of IC4Design. Their mission: to interpret infrastructure in their own very special way.
For the interior we thought it would be fun to have Christoph Niemann take on what I believe is the longest illustration we've ever commissioned. It ran, mostly in the margins, through the entire book, even taking over our On Language column. Here's a look at some other highlights:
For this story on the Obamas' marriage, we wanted the type to feel celebratory but elegant.
Every year we do an issue dedicated to the year's most interesting ideas and inventions. It's filled with fascinating commissions by photographers, designers, artists and illustrators.
Illustrating with type is something we love doing when given the opportunity. Here's an example of Knockout at its best--large and powerful.
Is there any part of this you didn't think about?
It's all in the details. Our end slug was pulled right from the logo itself, the dot on the "i" to be exact. This was a small but proud moment for us. I'm sure you saw the connection right away...right?
Of course. Right away. I've been waiting for you to get to that actually. (laughs) Any last words here for GRIDS?
Thanks for reading. I realize this was a long entry. I'd be happy to answer any questions and would love to hear your feedback.
I'd like to also give a special shout-out to our Deputy Art Director, Gail Bichler, who was a crucial part of this redesign as well as a group of amazingly talented designers: Cathy Gilmore-Barnes, Hilary Greenbaum, Leo Jung, Nancy Harris Rouemy, Ian Allen, Leslie Kwok and Robert Vargas. And last but not least, our editor, Gerry Marzorati, for his support and constant motivation, our Director of Photography, Kathy Ryan, who is brilliant in every way, and her team of editors, Clinton Cargill, Joanna Milter, Luise Stauss, and Marvin Orellana.
Thank you, Rem, for this amazing look at what it took to redesign the venerable New York Times Magazine and what it takes today to put together 52 issues of the magazine a year. Readers, what did you expect Rem to answer here that he hasn't yet? Ask away in the comments...
No comments:
Post a Comment